<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Productivity on Commentathor</title><link>https://commentathor.de/tags/productivity/</link><description>Recent content in Productivity on Commentathor</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>de</language><copyright>Thorsten Schwesig</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://commentathor.de/tags/productivity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI doesn't take work away from you.</title><link>https://commentathor.de/posts/ai-doesnt-remove-work/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://commentathor.de/posts/ai-doesnt-remove-work/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="it-just-shows-you-how-much-work-would-be-possible">It just shows you how much work would be possible.&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>&lt;em>&lt;a href="https://commentathor.de/posts/ai-keine-grenzen-mehr">Diesen Artikel auf Deutsch lesen&lt;/a>&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There&amp;rsquo;s a comforting story going around right now: AI makes us more productive, saves time, and frees us from work. That&amp;rsquo;s the official version. The unofficial one is considerably less pleasant: many people are working more than before. Not because they have to. Because they can.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Work used to be constrained by things nobody actually liked, but that turned out to be surprisingly useful: time, friction, complexity. These weren&amp;rsquo;t bugs in the system — they were a kind of built-in circuit breaker. They forced you to stop at some point. Eventually you&amp;rsquo;d hit the moment where the effort simply wasn&amp;rsquo;t worth it anymore. &amp;ldquo;Good enough&amp;rdquo; wasn&amp;rsquo;t a philosophy. It was a necessity.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>